Functionality Issues with the Topflytech T880X Protocol on Various Devices (e.g., TLW2-12BL)

is there any news about the protocol integration issue causing high sim data consumption

There are several changes we have made to the original protocol. The protocol has different variants, regardless of the headers 2323, 2525, 2626, 2727. For example, the 2525 header has two variants, each with different types of messages that differ significantly from each other. If you send us the logs, we can help.

hello,.........I´m experiencing same issues with a Pioneer x100 from Topflytech. any news or recommendation?

Hi, any updates on this?
I noticed there’s a pending pull request on GitHub.

Topflytech devices have different types of messages within the same protocol. Many of them require a mandatory server response by default; otherwise, they keep resending the message, which triggers high data consumption on the SIM card. This is the case with alarm messages, for example. Also, in the case of the Pioneer X100, there are changes in the protocol compared to the previous TLW2 series. If you can share the log messages you are getting from those devices, I can help correct what is happening. A temporary option could be to disable the ACK (acknowledgment) in the devices for those message types so they don't keep waiting for a server response.

Hi,

I'm currently testing two Topflytech devices: the Pioneer X100 and the TLD2-D.

I've started identifying some protocol-related issues. For example, in the case of the TLD2-D, the reported speed is always zero. I will begin by creating a GitHub issue specifically for this.

Thanks in advance.