Why did you expect more?
I expected less :)
I am testing for a very small use case, about 10 vehicles. It is a lot of RAM for such a small deployment, I do believe.
Is it right for it to be this high? I am ignorant on the specifics of this software.
EDIT: Also, I expected about 512MB, because of the Java entry point. But then again, I may just have misunderstood that 512MB reference.
It could be related to the way Java handles memory allocation. It pre-allocates some memory for JVM even if the process doesn't use that much yet.
I expected about 512MB, because of the Java entry point
Can you explain what you mean?
It spawns quite a few workers, each with about 350 MBof RAM as you can see: https://imgur.com/a/v4PZNrE
I am using the unmodified Debian Dockerfile
EDIT:
I expected the whole software usage to be 512 MB of Ram. The entrypoint has "-Xms512m", "-Xmx512m".
I do remember one specifies the maximum ram, the other the initially allocated RAM: could I tweak that setting to avoid this huge ram usage?
That doesn't look right.. why are there so many processes? There should be one.
This is the docker-compose.yml I am using, I wrote it myself (just censored the details of passwords).
I did expose more ports to make a few tries, but it should not affect things.
I am using the Debian Dockerfile.
version: '3'
services:
app:
build: .
#image: 'traccar/traccar:latest'
container_name: traccar
restart: unless-stopped
ports:
- '8052:8082'
- '5000-5150:5000-5150/udp'
- '5000-5150:5000-5150'
- '50000-50150/udp'
- '50000-50150'
volumes:
- ./traccar/logs:/opt/traccar/logs:rw
- ./traccar/traccar.xml:/opt/traccar/conf/traccar.xml:ro
- ./traccar/data:/opt/traccar/data:rw
depends_on:
- traccar_db
traccar_db:
image: 'jc21/mariadb-aria:latest'
restart: unless-stopped
container_name: traccar_db
environment:
MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD: 'password'
MYSQL_DATABASE: 'db'
MYSQL_USER: 'user'
MYSQL_PASSWORD: 'password'
volumes:
- ./mysql:/var/lib/mysql:rw
Have you tried running standalone docker image without docker compose? If it's also happening there, you can probably log a bug on github.
I'll do it right now.
Using the docker run command from the github page it does not remain up.
I will check back in an hour or so.
Alright, I did some testing.
There are still A TON of processes using the docker run from the github page, but ram usage is definitely down.
Very confusing.
I recommend asking on GitHub. I'm not very familiar with docker setup.
Will do, thanks!
Is the docker github mantained?
Hello,
I have deployed a small traccar server from the docker image, and I am seeing 6 GB of RAM allocated to it, while I expected much more. I have both tried building from the dockerfile or using the image provided.
I am very confused, what am I doing wrong?