One tenant/database scheme for each group
How does it make it more secure? I don't think it's a good idea. Nobody is doing it because it adds more complexity without any benefits.
How does it make it more secure? I don't think it's a good idea. Nobody is doing it because it adds more complexity without any benefits.
Say, you have different groups having their own devices. Is Traccar supporting different schemes for each group? I am thinking that it would be more secure to separate each group to another scheme. This requires, though, dynamic scheme creation. What do you think? Is it a good idea?