Mostly to match a Java types, which only has signed integers.
but Java has long
type which could be great match for UNSIGNED BIG INTEGER? But ofc there should be careful that it won't overflow.
It's still a signed type.
Ok :). I noticed that and found this weird. But thanks for explanation!
It might not be ideal, but we haven't had any problems so far, so no reason to change.
Hi,
I'm wondering that why "id" field is not UNSIGNED BIG INTEGER? Why it is just INT?
Cheers!