I'm running the latest Traccar with a Queclink GV500CNA reporting on the gl200 protocol (port 5004). After updating to the current version, the frames no longer throw the IndexOutOfBoundsException they previously did — but the device still shows offline and no position is decoded. The device is sending the binary @Track Pro format (Data ID 82, Full Location), not the ASCII +RESP:GTFRI format. The frames are received cleanly with no error, but no position is extracted.
Sample frames (IMEI 865134050947226):
2b000038000865134050947226820300030000216a3ed6f101895000521629fa8b28f402ac1a8e6a3ed6f100001600000010f505010ff824
2b000038000865134050947226820300030000216a3ed6d301885000521629fa8b28f402ac1a8e6a3ed6d300001600000010f505010ecb24
The coordinate data appears present (the 1629fa8b28f4 / 02ac1a8e bytes repeat across reports from a stationary device). Is the binary Data ID 82 frame format supported, or could a decoder be added for this newer GV500CNA firmware? I have the full @Track Protocol Pro spec available if helpful.
Please provide the documentation.
I'm running the latest Traccar with a Queclink GV500CNA reporting on the gl200 protocol (port 5004). After updating to the current version, the frames no longer throw the IndexOutOfBoundsException they previously did — but the device still shows offline and no position is decoded. The device is sending the binary @Track Pro format (Data ID 82, Full Location), not the ASCII +RESP:GTFRI format. The frames are received cleanly with no error, but no position is extracted.
Sample frames (IMEI 865134050947226):
The coordinate data appears present (the 1629fa8b28f4 / 02ac1a8e bytes repeat across reports from a stationary device). Is the binary Data ID 82 frame format supported, or could a decoder be added for this newer GV500CNA firmware? I have the full @Track Protocol Pro spec available if helpful.