As long as your ingestion service can handle the data, I don't see any problem, especially if we're just talking about 1500 devices.
Hey Anton,
first of all, it’s really great that you’re replying personally. Your project is amazing, and you have my full respect.
The point that’s still unclear to me is about performance and workload. As I understand it, the main load should be on the endpoint that receives and processes the forwarded connections — not necessarily on the server that is acting as the forwarder.
So speaking purely theoretically: would a server with 4 GB RAM and 2 vCPUs be able to forward data from around 1,500 devices without any issues in 2s or 10s Interval.
That’s exactly what I’m trying to understand — whether the performance-critical part is the endpoint processing the data, or the listener that receives and forwards it.
Thanks again for your time!
Typically the main bottleneck is the database. If you skip it and just forward data, then Traccar won't use much resources. Yes, 4GB RAM would be enough in that case.
So for that case I can use H2 database with daily delete ? Or do your prefair mariadb
I saw that you removed the option for disable local history
By no database I mean literally no database (database.memory config option).
If done it like this in my compose file:
TZ: "Europe/Berlin"
CONFIG_USE_ENVIRONMENT_VARIABLES: "true"
PROTOCOLS_ENABLE: "telic,teltonika,dualcam,bce,gt06,osmand,ruptela"
PROTOCOL_TIMEOUT: "60"
LOGGER_CONSOLE: "true"
LOGGER_LEVEL: "info"
DATABASE_MEMORY: "true"
DATABASE_SAVEORIGINAL: "false"
DATABASE_REGISTERUNKNOWN: "true"
DATABASE_THROTTLEUNKNOWN: "false"
FORWARD_ENABLE: "true"
FORWARD_TYPE: "json"
FORWARD_URL: "${FORWARD_URL}"
FORWARD_HEADER: "Authorization: Bearer ${FORWARD_BEARER_TOKEN}"
FORWARD_RETRY_ENABLE: "true"
FORWARD_RETRY_DELAY: "1000"
FORWARD_RETRY_COUNT: "3"
FORWARD_RETRY_LIMIT: "100"
EVENT_FORWARD_ENABLE: "true"
EVENT_FORWARD_TYPE: "json"
EVENT_FORWARD_URL: "${EVENT_FORWARD_URL}"
EVENT_FORWARD_HEADER: "Authorization: Bearer ${FORWARD_BEARER_TOKEN}"
FILTER_ENABLE: "true"
FILTER_INVALID: "true"
FILTER_ZERO: "false"
FILTER_DUPLICATE: "true"
FILTER_FUTURE: "86400"
GEOCODER_ENABLE: "false"
GEOLOCATION_ENABLE: "false"
SPEEDLIMIT_ENABLE: "false"
but i only get
2026-04-30 17:17:40 WARN: Unknown device - 1XXXXXXXXXXX (X.X.X.1)
2026-04-30 17:17:40 INFO: [Tcbb7e41f: teltonika > X.X.X.X] 00
2026-04-30 17:17:40 INFO: [Tcbb7e41f] disconnected
2026-04-30 17:19:41 INFO: [T58969347] connected
so did i miss somthing =?
You're missing DATABASE_REGISTER_UNKNOWN parameter.
Hello Traccar community,
I have a question regarding a configuration/application example. I would like to run Traccar as a listener in forwarder mode. Unfortunately, I haven’t been able to find any information about how the system performs in this setup — for example, how it behaves with different reporting intervals (e.g., 10 seconds vs. 2 seconds) and varying numbers of devices (e.g., 500 vs. 1500 devices).
I was also considering running the whole setup in Docker, including Traccar, MariaDB, Watchtower, and Autoheal.
Has anyone had experience with this kind of setup or can share some insights on performance and scalability?
Thank you in advance!